Maybe....
So this is partially speculation but I think it makes sense.
To give a possible answer to your question Mark I think that poor sand pickup on bare floors is partially due to both the main unit and the nozzle
If i remember correctly with the SRX they moved back to the narrow but wide air channel kind of like the PN-2
Looking over Bill's data this narrow channel has always been problematic his D4 got around 42 nozzle cfm with the old boxy nozzle and 33 with the PN-2
This was repeated with the PN2E and the PN-12 using a E2 Blue The PN2E scored 47.27 CFM (off) and the pn-12 scored 59.38 (off) attached to the same E2 blue.
In addition to this the SRX nozzle seems very poorly sealed when i attempted to measure it on my airflow box I noticed leakage around the front vent, both of the rear vents and the nozzle neck.
I think we all know that suction helps maintain airflow over a distance since the SRX has lower suction that previous models it seems that it ends up losing more over similar distances Look at this chart of the data i've collected we can see the E2 black (my sample) starts off with less flow and more suction but it's higher suction power helps it retain more of that airflow. That and the lower the flow the less resistance it will encounter.
Now I will say when I did my test of the SRX my voltage was running low at around 115 so that most likely effected the results Seeing as I got 52" of suction from the hose where others have gotten 58" So if my voltage were running closer to the usual 120 it may have better but since the SRX was brought here by a friend who lives....like 4 hours away it's not something I really have access to.
