New Innovative Dyson FluffyCones PencilVac

[Vacuum Facts]

I mean, it's clear I'm unlikely going to change your feelings on this persistent misinterpretation and sticking issue for you that's leading to an irrational unfriendliness, but hopefully you understand the rationale for the reduction in motor size at least.

 

[huskyvacs]

VacuumFacts was banned on the old site. IDK how he got unbanned. He is a nuisance, and highly annoying and aggressive when you threaten his narrow-minded world view. He has had his reddit accounts banned 8 times. Also nobody cares about Dyson but kids that think having the most expensive stuff fluffs up their ego to lack for poor upbringing. I have 15 Dysons in my collection and they are not any better than any other vacuum - and - they ruin my carpet.

 

[Vacuum Facts]

VacuumFacts was banned on the old site. IDK how he got unbanned. He is a nuisance, and highly annoying and aggressive when you threaten his narrow-minded world view. He has had his reddit accounts banned 8 times. Also nobody cares about Dyson but kids that think having the most expensive stuff fluffs up their ego to lack for poor upbringing. I have 15 Dysons in my collection and they are not any better than any other vacuum - and - they ruin my carpet.

Huh? I joined here for the very first time a couple of days ago and never had a reddit account or use that website. It was therefore not even possible to be banned or be "a nuisance, and highly annoying and aggressive". That's evidently only what I've experienced here in the last 2 days.

It's actually quite funny reading this. It's like reading about someone else. I've often been smeared by a few for explaining the truth and helping people understand it. Apparently my image has evolved without me knowing into some mythical beast with 3 heads that breathes fire and eats puppies. Dread to think what I'd find if I did a search for my name.

 

[desiredname]

It definitely is true that so many other vacuum brands have copied Dyson over the years. That new motor is quite impressive, I look forward to seeing it in action.

 

[kirbyman65]

Vacuum facts,
I don’t want to argue I just want to state my opinion. You claim that Dyson “solves a problem” which they did. They created a light weight stick vacuum. I don’t think the bag less technology solved any problems. With a bagged vacuum you pay approximately $20 a year for bags and a belt or 2. With a bag less vacuum you spend THE SAME AMOUNT to replace the filters. Additionally in my honest opinion I’m not a fan of their cyclones. They don’t work for me and they clog up rather quickly. James Dyson didn’t create the bag less vacuum. Rexair did. His claims that their vacuums don’t lose suction are also false. 50% of the Dysons I repair have no suction at all.
-Jack

 

[amtraksebo1997]

Vacuum facts,
I don’t want to argue I just want to state my opinion. You claim that Dyson “solves a problem” which they did. They created a light weight stick vacuum. I don’t think the bag less technology solved any problems. With a bagged vacuum you pay approximately $20 a year for bags and a belt or 2. With a bag less vacuum you spend THE SAME AMOUNT to replace the filters. Additionally in my honest opinion I’m not a fan of their cyclones. They don’t work for me and they clog up rather quickly. James Dyson didn’t create the bag less vacuum. Rexair did. His claims that their vacuums don’t lose suction are also false. 50% of the Dysons I repair have no suction at all.
-Jack

And yet he goes after us and claims the ones spreading misinformation. Let's also not forget his pick up tests on a non flow-through waterproof carpet, so pretty much every machine he tested that wasn't a Dyson did horribly.

Like I said, unless you're gonna knock it all off, you can get out. It's one thing to like and collect Dyson vacuums, it's a another thing to put them on a pedestal, act like they're the absolute best vacuums known to man, and bash down other brands/people who like said brands with phony tests and irrelevant data. We know what we're talking about when it comes to vacuum cleaners. You clearly don't.

 

[Vacuum Facts]

I understand. Agree to disagree, really, and that's fine. The tests I conduct are absolutely not phony or irrelevant. The data is real, representative, reproducible, and makes physical sense. The detailed science is known and explained for anyone interested. I put the full truth out there. Everything I look at gets a fair crack of the whip (and I have criticised aspects of Dyson machines at times). How people choose to interpret the facts evidenced reveals more about themselves, and people can make their own judgements on that. For anyone receptive to facts and truth, I'm here to help clarify any specifics that are not understood. If people disagree, no problem, but this isn't really a platform where I'd argue (come to my channel for that).

 

[huskyvacs]

We know who you are and how you are. Your name has come up for years - nearly a decade now - and this has already been discussed over and over and over again. You can't undo the damage you have already caused to this community. Many collectors have had the misfortune of dealing with you on their channels. You are narcissist like Johnny Somali who likes to peacock and talk crap until someone punches your card, then you go hide and run away. This is why you like to attack the younger fans who do not have the tact or experience to deal with personalities like yours, where you bully them into backing down or manipulate them into agreeing with everything you say. Childish.

When someone goes out shopping, they always come back with receipts:

"I am the only 'major' channel who has not blocked him as far as I know, because I can take the abuse and generally not care, and it's funny watching him wade in with a comment and suddenly running away when all my fans rip him to shreds. However sadly I know of at least 2 examples where his comments and general idiocy caused 2 people who I personally really like to either stop fully or go quiet for a while as their minds just could not shake it off like I can. And that's wrong. So he is just blocked as it's easier (which I should do really, but I like to poke the angry bee every once in a while when I'm bored) I share your pain everyone!"​

~Sam/Beko​

Jul. 14, 2018: https://vacuumland.org/threads/paid-dyson-and-shark-reviews-plaguing-internet.36945/

Mar. 15, 2019: https://vacuumland.org/threads/the-most-frustrating-vacuum-video-on-youtube.38196/

Mar. 19, 2022: https://vacuumland.org/threads/my-reasons-why-johnnyl8-vacuumfacts-sucks.43109/

Jan 3. 2025:

I will not engage any more in this topic because everything has already been discussed year after year and everyone else has said my exact thoughts.

 

[Vacuum Facts]

o_o Damn. Thanks for the welcome. Hope you feel better at least now.

 

[Vacuum Facts]

Wow!!! It is a knock-off of a Panasonic design!!!

So, it turns out I got some details wrong in my video addressing this. There are patents for Dyson's idea of conical brushbars for anti hair tangling that date back earlier than I originally identified, to 11/12/2018, with a public publication date of 20/06/2019 and considerably before Panasonic's patent. This really does show there is ground to think Panasonic just read the patent and duped the idea and why they patented it only locally in Japan to avoid conflict and/or circumvent. Their US product promo specifically states it was 'patented in Japan', presumably because it would be denied now outside that region due to conflict. I regret not seeing this before posting this video now.

There are figures in the Dyson patent from years earlier that look suspiciously like the eventual Panasonic design (see figure) and their description reads as below, clearly indicating hair migrating to that central region. "The brushbar 502 has substantially the same structure as the brushbar 10 previously described, but also has a further debris collection channel 504 located centrally along the brushbar 502. This may be beneficial as debris may have to travel a reduced distance along the brushbar 502, and hence there is a reduced risk of debris wrapping around the brushbar 502 as it travels along the brushbar 502 in use. The further debris collection channel 504 is a region of the brushbar 502 that has a reduced diameter relative to the remainder of the brushbar 502, and the further debris collection channel 504 extends about substantially the entire circumference of the brushbar 502."

As always, it really does now look like the Panasonic product is a knock-off unused Dyson design.