My Extensive Collection Part 7

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dan

I agree that the robo vac would take away the pleasure of vacuuming, I have just been intrigued with them for the "chase the Cat factor".

Actually my cat likes the vacuum, he will lay on the Kirby when it's running. He loves to lay in front of any vacuum and keep you from moving. Only vac he is not crazy about is the Electrolux Versatility. Surprising because that machine is relatively quiet. I think it's because the exhaust is up front an he doesn't like the blowing.
 
Hmmm, I think that's my point. Some of the Panasonic canisters have been around an awful long time. I think it's a good thing. They're reliable machines of a classic design, four full sized attachments, button lock wands, a simple circuit design, all of which have been around since the 1980s. Are these not the exact qualities so many here miss with their modern, high tech machines? I read the complaints about tiny attachments, small and expensive HEPA bags, finicky electronics, etc with mentions of longing for the old days of more simple machines with bigger attachments. If that is what you want buy a Panasonic.

The MC-CG902 in particular has been around since the latter part of the '90s as various Kenmore and Panasonic models. It is as proven and reliable a vacuum as you can buy at any price and you will get two decades of trouble free use from it with reasonable care. Probably more the way we dote on our vacuums. It is like taking a trip in a time machine and returning with one of our favorite classics, fresh from the factory. The more upscale Panasonic bagged canisters are developments of this model. Synthetic cloth HEPA bags can be bought at any Sears six for twenty bucks. Filters are likewise shared with Kenmores, and are cheap and abundant. They are also good. Most of the machine has been around in one form or another for 20 to 35 years. All the bugs were worked out ages ago. Buy it and enjoy it. The money you will save over the vastly more costly machines many here tend to recommend can be used to add classics to your collection.

Just a thought.
 
I just checked out

The Panasonic web site all the machines still look the same just different colors .
I am not saying they aren't good vacuums they just aren't as exciting as a Tacony or high end DTD
Vacuum . The one bagless is interesting but the Kenmore version offers more and if you catch a sale its a better value . So I do have modern Panasonic vacuums but they are labeled Kenmore :)

Dan
 
There was a time when.....

Panasonic's made tol vacuums. This would be in the 80's. They had an upright with push button selection controls. Low, Medium, High. They were self adjusting for carpet. Their canisters were also top of the line, with variable speeds, brush strips that could be replaced, etc. I could only afford to buy one vacuum a year at that time, and I finally sold it to my aunt, when I bought my next vacuum.



Sincerely,

PR-21
 
The MC-CG902 is on a different body from the MC-CG917 and MC-CG937. It is identically a late '90s Kenmore Progressive with a much more powerful motor. The other two share a different body with an extractor cage in the bag chamber just like a Kenmore Intuition or the new Elite canister as well as improved internal airflow and exhaust filtration.

What feature does a TOL Kenmore have that the MC-CG937 doesn't have? Both have variable speed motors (same pc boards), extractor cages in the bag chamber, the same cord winder, same motors, etc. Both have identical hose materials. Kenmore hoses operate Panasonics and vice versa (which means you can use a Panasonic hose on your new Elite and use conventional wands with it!). About the only differences are the wands. Kenmore has their new style large diameter wands and Panasonic has traditional 1 1/4 inch button lock wands. Panasonic arguably has much better attachments than recent Kenmores use. Both use the same bags so you can buy cloth HEPA Q bags at Sears for them. I see it boiling down to what wands and attachments you prefer. I prefer the Panasonic wands and attachments. Oh yes, the extractor cage in the Panasonic lifts out with the bag in place for easy replacement and disposal of the full bag. Not so with the current TOL Kenmore. Btw, the TOL Kenmore has a smaller bag chamber than the Panasonic.

The Panasonic TOL list for $100 less than the TOL Kenmore and both can be obtained for a song from freight liquidators. My MC-CG937 cost me $83.50, shipping was $8.95. I have paid more for classic Panasonic Jet Flo canisters in my collection. Much more in one case.

I don't see the Panasonics lacking features or quality, especially compared to Kenmore. All they lack are the ridiculous prices some other vacuum makers charge.
 
Panasonic bagged canisters have the same powered floor brush Kenmore sells as the Powermate. Panasonic makes them for Kenmore at their plant in Monterrey Mexico.
 
I have and enjoy both Kirbyloverdan. I was hoping others might give the brand some reasoned consideration. It is an alternative overlooked among the enthusiasm for brands costing two to four times as much, one of the largest producers of vacuum cleaners in the world and they are invisible here.
 
Panamania,

In response to your email, the panasonic doesn't sell because we offer better brands that are easier to service and protect the independent retailer.
 
Thank you Dan, good catch. Fred mentioned this to me late Tuesday night and I completely spaced it the next day.

I told DT that if he wanted to post again he had to do it under the second username he set up where I have stated next to his username "probationary member". I told him that message will stay until I see a complete improvement in his online behavior. But as usual he simply refuses to follow the rules.

It appears he believes he's entitled to do whatever he wants. It's a complete waste of his time because we always catch him within a few day and then I delete the username and all of his posts.

Please do email me if/when anyone suspects a new member is Desert Tortoise again. I will take care of that as soon as possible. It takes me all of two seconds to delete the posts and his username, so it's no big deal for me.

Thanks everyone, my apologies everyone for this unnecessary interruption in this thread.
 
@Panamania

Aren't U originally known as Metaphor (formerly DesertTortoise¬member on probation)

Panamania=Metaphor=DesertTortoise=same individual[this post was last edited: 12/11/2014-17:48]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top