MIELE BOOST CX1
- Thread starter eniot
- Start date
Help Support VacuumLand:
tseg
Well-known member
Thanks for sharing... unfortunately these mini-bagless vacs that can barely hold a shirt pocket full of lint just don't do it for me.
I suspect the many millions that love bagless vacs have never actually washed the various internal filters... ever, much less monthly as the fine print demands.
I suspect the many millions that love bagless vacs have never actually washed the various internal filters... ever, much less monthly as the fine print demands.
eurekaprince
Well-known member
Shark has also introduced a compact bagless canister in the UK. Our friend Roger Sensotronic has uploaded a new unboxing and demo video on YouTube:
It looks like a pure trash. Whoever said Dyson's newest Cinetic cylinder was over engineered hasn't seen this coming
Am I the only one thinking this comb is some kind of joke?
Bin looks messy to empty and I'm sure it's not gonna be sealed like Blizzard isn't. Tools on hose? Seriously?
Am I the only one thinking this comb is some kind of joke?
Bin looks messy to empty and I'm sure it's not gonna be sealed like Blizzard isn't. Tools on hose? Seriously?
fanofvacuums2
Active member
I probably would not buy one new, but there are parts of it that I like more than the Blizzard such as the filters. The bin size also looks decent especially with the small build of the unit and I would be interested to see how effective the cyclone is. Overall, it is something I would like to have just for the novelty of it, but not something I would want to use as my only vacuum cleaner. It sort of reminds me of some of those little Japanese bagless canisters that started coming into the United States that had similar filter and bin designs, a lot of which came with brushes stored somewhere on the unit as well.
That Shark canister looks interesting as well. I have worked on many machines manufactured by the OEM that makes most (if not all) of the Sharks and their canisters are consistently better than their uprights, largely because they do not have awful stretch hoses. On the other hand, I have never been a fan of those DuoClean heads (at least on the uprights) partly because almost every one I receive is destroyed in some way. I cannot imagine that they improved the design immensely just for the canister. Also, hopefully that cyclone is better than the ones on the upright, as pre-motor filter setup does not look all that great.
That Shark canister looks interesting as well. I have worked on many machines manufactured by the OEM that makes most (if not all) of the Sharks and their canisters are consistently better than their uprights, largely because they do not have awful stretch hoses. On the other hand, I have never been a fan of those DuoClean heads (at least on the uprights) partly because almost every one I receive is destroyed in some way. I cannot imagine that they improved the design immensely just for the canister. Also, hopefully that cyclone is better than the ones on the upright, as pre-motor filter setup does not look all that great.
huskyvacs
Well-known member
What's the deal with making "the worlds smallest canister" and then making it a canister? Wouldn't that make it even more harder and cumbersome to pull around and use because you have to kneel down every time you want to use it? Or get stuck on every piece of furniture?
I have a Bissell Zing! I use for crumb patrol on the kitchen, and I end up just carrying it under my arm as I use it because it's so small.
I have a Bissell Zing! I use for crumb patrol on the kitchen, and I end up just carrying it under my arm as I use it because it's so small.
