It all adds up.
When we were at Kirby this summer, the head engineer who gave the tour talked about design issues. One thing he said that struck me: whatever they do, the Kirby has to look like a Kirby, sound like a Kirby, and function like a Kirby.
Honestly I would have been surprised with some radical break in the basic design.
Look if someone wants a completely different approach to a vacuum cleaner, there are plenty of brands with their own identity, sort of. But some people will want a Kirby; and they have a base that is loyal. And there are many home situations where a Kirby provides an excellent cleaning system. To be sure lots of people buy a Kirby and then dump it for another machine soon after; it didn't suit them or their needs. But there are all kinds of people who like them, enjoy using them, like the attachments and feel like they're getting their money's worth in the long run. Otherwise Kirby would not be still in business as it's own company instead of being sold to somebody else to produce hybrid generic sort of non descript mostly plastic tools on board vacuum cleaners. But if that's what somebody really wants, there are plenty of colors to choose from out there at all kinds of price points. And really, most of them basically clean OK.
I would have been surprised if Kirby tried to replicate something you could find in a big discount store. Why bother with that?
I think it looks cool; I am interested to see what they did with the attachments and especially what the guys at the brush roll factory hinted about --some sort of floor scrubber/ hard floor cleaner??? It'll be interesting to see what's actually on this new machine.
But in the end, a Kirby is going to be...well, a Kirby!
