Hoover Windtunnels

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

ncovert

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
265
Location
Grove City, PA
OK, here's a thread for Hoover Windtunnel vacuums! Post your pictures of them (NO stock photos please), ramble on about them, or post Windtunnel ads if you have any.

It doesn't matter if the vacuum in your photo was made in 1999 or 2009, so long as the vacuum actually has Windtunnel Technology and it is your photo!
 
Well I have the Self-Propelled Anniversary model. The bag door will not stay shut today. I'm taking a break from Windtunnels and Hoovers.
 
Hoover Windtunnel Bagless U5700-RM. Yes, apparently this machine was purchased as a Genuine Hoover Remanufactured machine! Got this from a yard sale. It was sitting at the curb stating Free or for parts. So I got home. Needed a fair amount of work. I do have the turbo nozzle for it, but I think the turbo nozzle actually works better on some of my other vacs. The suction is good on this Windtunnel but not as strong as some other Windtunnels. It is missing the tool cover, which I find the tools stay on nice and snug anyway, I'm probably not going to waste money on the door.

durango159++9-26-2012-22-15-58.jpg
 
I have a 2006 self propelled bagged windtunnel, it gets a lot of use and the suction is absolutely fantastic! It needs new belts though, I think it still has the originals. I got it at goodwill in 2010 and I think I paid like $10 for it. It was filthy, the bag was packed, and all the attachments are there, but both extension wands are broken on the ends. After a good cleaning, it is one of my favorite vacuums.
 
This picture is primarily to show the Windtunnel Supreme U5458-8910. For some reason I don't have any solo pics of this individual machine yet. This was purchased at a yard sale, it is in great cosmetic condition. The agitator brush was a disaster when I got, so much hair, I couldn't even see the white of the agitator brushes!!

The agitator was replaced with the yellow bristles, wooden bodied CWP brush. The machine runs smooth, has terrific suction but to be quite honest, I don't think it performs as well as some of the older models like the U5445 burgundy Windtunnel Supreme. I think I'm going to blame the CWP brush roll for this!! I just don't think the brush roll performs as well as the genuine Hoover. I find the handle a little bulky too! Overall a good machine but not one of my favorites. I'd rather use my Hoover Power Drive or definitely a power nozzle canister!

Please note that the picture was taken prior to the restoration. Although there is still no attachment door. I don't like using attachments with this machine because the stretch hose gives no room and the machine falls over too easily, therefore I will most like not use the attachment caddy on this machine too often and bother getting a door!

durango159++9-26-2012-22-23-12.jpg
 
My parents now have this, however I picked it out and purchased it and its still within the family. Hoover Windtunnel Plus S3639 canister. Love it!! I sold our Kenmore Progressive 25513 and replaced it with this!! So much better cleaning, easier to use, sounds better, just love it!! I even really like the Windtunnel Turbo hand tool!!

I know this line of canisters was semi cheaply made with leaky canister units, poor filters, stiff cord which over stressed the cord reels, and lousy power nozzle wheel axles, however for the price and performance I love them!! The hose is quite durable, and very flexible. The attachments are FANTASTIC, love the rubber fingers on the upholstery nozzle. The bare floor tool, does a great job, if it was horsehair it would do even better. The bristle layout is spot on! So much better than the terrible bare floor brush design that Kenmore/ Panasonic has used forever! I've had tremendous results in my cleaning business with this style machine whether its a PowerMax or Windtunnel and the Turbo Power 5000 S3577, Futura style is good.

durango159++9-26-2012-22-31-51.jpg
 
In the secondary market that I sell into, one of my most successful products is the Hoover Windtunnel bagged, self-propelled (U6400) series. They have excellent suction, for their price point they are reasonably rugged, they are fairly easy and economical to repair, people like the optional self-propulsion feature, bags are inexpensive and widely available. They offer buyers an option in a pantheon of new machines where few bagged upright vacuum cleaners are currently found.

From the standpoint of refurbing, the bagged SP Windtunnels are less problematic than the bagless. The latter have a diverter valve mechanism in the floor nozzle that is more commonly broken and expensive to repair.

The most commonly broken part in the Windtunnel bagged SP upright is the actuator arm for the controls on the SP feature. 90% of the machines I work on have this part broken. And if it looks intact, take a second, closer look, because it's likely to be cracked where it's difficult to see. Part is cheap and fairly easy to replace w/o removing the drive from the nozzle frame.

Some customers buy the less fancy non-SP bagged Windtunnel, preferring its net lighter weight to the SP model. Usually this involves women or stair issues. The non-SP Windtunnel has the same impressive suction that the SP has.

The Windtunnel name signifies a patented design in the area of the floor nozzle, so any Hoover upright (or canister w/ Windtunnel floor nozzle unit) that incorporates this design can rightly be called by the name. That includes some of the newer, Chinese-made machines. Of these, I've worked on some of the different UH-70000 series models but without much conviction. As refurbed, second-hand mdse., they sell reasonably well but I believe only because they "look newer." If you demonstrate and explain technical differences, some buyers will be receptive, others will still go strictly by appearance. And that conundrum describes selling consumer goods in a nutshell.
 
szymonrules

Well, you can talk about it is what I meant by ramble on. It's similar to the "elites,elites,elites" thread, only for Windtunnels though
 
NConvert: These pictures of my Windtunnels were taken over a month ago, when I acquired them that day from a yard sale. Both machines needed lots of work. Since then, both machines were thorougly washed, recieved new filters, new belts, new agitators, new lower cord hork for bagless edition. Motors have been checked, machines tested, cords are neatly wound right now, Only not really complete are attachment sets with covers which I don't plan on using either of these machines much for that purpose so I probably won't bother too much gettin those parts, just use other vacuums for attachment usage.
 
windtunnel canister

I absolutely love my windtunnel bagged canister. bought it off craigslist for $15 I believe a while back. suprisingly, I wanted to get it because I heard the powernozzles are very good, and wanted to try it out on my rainbow, not knowing it has that funky 3-prong plug. It needed a belt, and didn't come with any attachments. and the attachment door and rewind pedal cover are still missing. I took the whole thing apart and cleaned it, and had to redo the end of the pn cord because the wire for the headlight was cut from wear. but man was I suprised at how quiet the main unit is, and how the pn pulls itself around. love the speed control too. I'm not a canister person, but I would have no problem using that one as a daily driver.

 
SNAP!

Hi Gareth.

Myself and Rob also have a South African Windtunnel in the form of model U5433 Windtunnel 1300 (I think this model also appears in your photo above).

It now lives with us in the UK...

turbopowerpaul++10-3-2012-15-47-26.jpg
 

Latest posts

Back
Top