Since a good number of vacuums in my collection have been vintage direct-air models, I am often forced to use plain paper bags. Hoover sells some excellent allergy bags I really like, but up until recently, paper was the only option. However, whenever I tried HEPA in my modern vacuums, such as a Hoover Windtunnel or Kirby Heritage II, I was never that impressed. I thought the extra cost of the bags was too much considering it didn't provide a significant increase in performance. But recently I've been thinking of ways the price might be justified. Let me know what you think.
*Could the consistent use of HEPA bags, considering how little dust they allow through and their increase in airflow, lengthen the life of the motor and the machine? Less repairs and replacements would certainly save money.
*In your experience, has the use of HEPA bags reduced allergies or improved air quality? Less time dusting or a reduction of allergy symptoms could definitely be worth the added price.
*Has anyone used these type of bags in a commercial environment? Since they maintain airflow longer than paper bags, less bags would have to purchased and less time would be wasted changing them. Plus, if they did increase motor life, vacuums would be replaced less often. Could these bags save money for a business?
*Are we aware of any environmental benefits? Polypropylene is a plastic, and plastic is produced from oil which is a non-renewable resource. Paper is technically renewable since trees can grow back within a 100 years. I doubt there are any environmental benefits, but would the high-volume HEPA bags result in less waste?
Can you think of anything else? I'd love to hear from personal experience and maybe we can come up with some answers.
*Could the consistent use of HEPA bags, considering how little dust they allow through and their increase in airflow, lengthen the life of the motor and the machine? Less repairs and replacements would certainly save money.
*In your experience, has the use of HEPA bags reduced allergies or improved air quality? Less time dusting or a reduction of allergy symptoms could definitely be worth the added price.
*Has anyone used these type of bags in a commercial environment? Since they maintain airflow longer than paper bags, less bags would have to purchased and less time would be wasted changing them. Plus, if they did increase motor life, vacuums would be replaced less often. Could these bags save money for a business?
*Are we aware of any environmental benefits? Polypropylene is a plastic, and plastic is produced from oil which is a non-renewable resource. Paper is technically renewable since trees can grow back within a 100 years. I doubt there are any environmental benefits, but would the high-volume HEPA bags result in less waste?
Can you think of anything else? I'd love to hear from personal experience and maybe we can come up with some answers.