EU Ratings

[turbo500]

"as long as it is emptied at the max line and has it's filters washed on time."


 


That's EXACTLY the point Tayyab. Dyson claim that their cleaner has 100% suction, 100% of the time, which is not true. It is reliant on the filters being 100% clean, 100% of the time, which is impossible.


 


Whether you notice it or not, there is an inevitable suction loss.

 

[dys0nb0y]

dyson easy out cleaned by machines 40 years

<p>i find the dyson dc41mk2 to out clean machines about 40 years old on all surfaces.because of its great suction at the head and it's fantastic brush bur.this is just my opinion. older dysons wouldn't but dyson finally make a vacuums that are fantastic and they are worth the money as old dysons  cleaning performance didn't match the price.so wood miele s7 and sebo

 

[marcusprit]

Miniscule and irrelevant loss of suction just being pedantic. Pedantic Chris

 

[dys0nb0y]

i haven't heard dyson say 100% of the suction 100% of the time.in a very very long time.

 

[marcusprit]

To be fair they do say no loss of suction. Maybe they should say no loss of suction providing the filters are washed when dirty. Which in my case won't be for at least 6 months. But with Cinetic they can safely say No loss of suction.

 

[dys0nb0y]

at least dyson don't say never loses suction like shark.

 

[dys0nb0y]

The dyson has better overall performance than any of vacuum.dyson has to do a lot of testing to prove this as now it has to be full proof as they could be sued by other vacuum companies. as now there is lots of obstacles compared to 10 years ago what you can say and what you can claim without the proper proof and testing.

 

[marcusprit]

Oh you've opened a can of worms now Joshua haha.

 

[turbo500]

But a suction loss is still a suction loss. It's still a false claim.

Don't get me wrong, it's not something that bothers me. All my vacs lose some suction as the bag fills up although it's not enough to hinder the performance. But it is still yet another false claim, or at the very least, a claim with a heap of small print conditions.

 

[marcusprit]

Not a heap of conditions just one. Wash the filter when dirty. Not applicable to the BIG BALL it's a monster!

 

[turbo500]

Have you used it, Marcus? Infact, has anyone on here?

Given the evidence in this thread about Dyson's false claims, I'm very surprised that people are so willing to believe the claims that Dyson are making about the Cinnetic without trying it out for themselves first.

 

[marcusprit]

I've tried the cylinder version that's been out a while now. Only on a demo but I've heard good things about it and don't forget there are a huge amount of happy Dyson customers out there who are loyal to the brand. I admit it's early days for the big ball but I'm confident it will be a winner providing the price comes down.

 

[parwaz786]

Well there is no filter to wash, so even if fine dust does go to the motor, Dyson would be concerned and add a filter. Did they though? No, so it is very very unlikely that fine dust would go to the motor

 

[sebo_fan]

The proof is in the pudding as Chris says. Unless you own it AND take apart the cyclones to inspect it, you'll be none the wiser.

 

[marcusprit]

People are making comments about the DC41 Mk11 without ever using it. And why would you have to take the cyclones apart?You can tell by the performance.

 

[rolls_rapide]

Imagine this scenario...

Mr & Mrs Smythe own a country house, with wood-burning stoves / fireplaces. They also own the Dyson Cinetic (upright or cylinder, it doesn't matter which).

In the course of daily use, the fireplaces accumulate ash. Maintenance of which requires disposal of the ash, creating dust, soot, etc.

What would happen if the Cinetic machines were used daily in this case? I don't think they would perform as Dyson claims. I think they would clog relatively quickly, with the exhaust filter becoming clogged. I don't think that Dyson has thought this through - and just remember - at those prices, the only people who will be able to afford the machines are the ones with fancy country homes and wood-burning stoves.

 

[dys0nb0y]

i disagree with youi don't think that's not fair saying people with country homes can afford them as that complete rubbish as people save up for them.and i think if a person has fireplace they will learn from their mistakests as if they need a new vacuum the old one probably broke for the ash so i think they would not do it again and i think they would buy one of those things you attach to your vacuums i can pick up things like that.

 

[dys0nb0y]

here we go i found a solution and it's quick an easy and doesn't break you vacuum

 

[marcusprit]

Haha only people who live in country homes? Wait till it comes on QVC over here and watch them fly And there will be offers on the price. I got my dyson for just over £300 with 6 tools.

 

[rolls_rapide]

My point is...

...that Dyson presumes that everyone uses their cleaner to suck up ordinary household "dust" only. Which is, of course, a somewhat short-sighted outlook.

We all know that people use their machines to clear up after diy, building work, accidental spillages, etc.

Dyson should be engineering their machines to cope with these extreme cases, rather than placing cop-out disclaimer labels upon the cleaners. Simples.