I decided to explain what those EU-limitations really mean and how they affect to the vacuums.
Note that these rules don't apply to the certain vacuums like:
- wet & dry, battery-operated, robot, industrial and central vacuum cleaners
- hand-held vacuum cleaners
- mattress cleaners
- ash vacuums
So vacuums have to meet these requirements:
- rated input power: less than 900 W (700 W is the most common motor size)
- maximum sound level: 80 dB(A)
- minimum dust pick up on carpet (dpuc): 0.75
- minimum dust pick up on hard floor (dpuhf) 0.98
- maximum dust re-emission: 1,00 %
- minimum operational motor lifetime: 500 hours
- minimum durability of the hose (if any): still usable after 40 000 oscillations under strain
Now how these show in reality:
To meet the pick up requirements floor/carpet nozzles are often re-designed (more sealed to the surface). Problem is that many of these nozzles are very hard to push on carpets/hard floors.
Getting more from the smaller wattage motor. Typical re-design is short as possible airpath from bag/bin to the nozzle (uprights). Separate hose for above the floor vacuuming is needed.
More efficient motor/turbine design.
More sound insulation and in some cases complete redesign.
Fully sealed HEPA filtration.
Now to the raw numbers (measured from the hose end)
Lets take Electrolux UltraFlex 700w vs 2100w
2100w motor
airflow = 85 cfm
suction = 110" waterlift
700w motor
airflow = 76 cfm
suction = 78" waterlift
So this is something what I often see. High wattage vacuums give much more suction, but airflow increases less.

Note that these rules don't apply to the certain vacuums like:
- wet & dry, battery-operated, robot, industrial and central vacuum cleaners
- hand-held vacuum cleaners
- mattress cleaners
- ash vacuums
So vacuums have to meet these requirements:
- rated input power: less than 900 W (700 W is the most common motor size)
- maximum sound level: 80 dB(A)
- minimum dust pick up on carpet (dpuc): 0.75
- minimum dust pick up on hard floor (dpuhf) 0.98
- maximum dust re-emission: 1,00 %
- minimum operational motor lifetime: 500 hours
- minimum durability of the hose (if any): still usable after 40 000 oscillations under strain
Now how these show in reality:
To meet the pick up requirements floor/carpet nozzles are often re-designed (more sealed to the surface). Problem is that many of these nozzles are very hard to push on carpets/hard floors.
Getting more from the smaller wattage motor. Typical re-design is short as possible airpath from bag/bin to the nozzle (uprights). Separate hose for above the floor vacuuming is needed.
More efficient motor/turbine design.
More sound insulation and in some cases complete redesign.
Fully sealed HEPA filtration.
Now to the raw numbers (measured from the hose end)
Lets take Electrolux UltraFlex 700w vs 2100w
2100w motor
airflow = 85 cfm
suction = 110" waterlift
700w motor
airflow = 76 cfm
suction = 78" waterlift
So this is something what I often see. High wattage vacuums give much more suction, but airflow increases less.
