Dyson Radial Root Cyclone Doesn't Work Very Well!

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Looks like they fix the problem on the new big ball as I think the problems was the dirt from the from seal getting into the filter chamber as they were quite close.

dys0nb0y++2-4-2015-11-20-4.jpg
 
looking back at older Dyson's, the efficiency has improved but they will never be perfect, I am convinced that bags trap more dust before the motor though, newer synthetic bags that is.
Although, without Dyson, bagged technology probably may not of moved forward as well as it has.
 
The cyclones have just been made perfect with the New kinetic the filtration must be amazing as I haven't got A pre-motor filter The cyclones must be efficient to not need that.
 
Haha I'm sure they wouldn't release Cinetic without thoroughly testing and perfecting over a very long period of time.
I'm sure it will work fine but only time will tell.
 
Personally I don't have a problem washing the filter every 3 to 6 months but some people either forget or can't be bothered so it's a good thing for them providing it works well of course.
 
Doesn't look like I'll be getting the kinetic where I was getting it from the deal wasn't working. Also I do really like the 41 MKII lunch and I'm not sure which one to get
 
Did anyone notice on the YouTube engineering demonstration of Cinetic 'science' - when they were demonstrating "ten years worth of dust" (they used a white powder), the opening of the hose is unobstructed? Having no attachment (like a crevice tool) on the end of the hose, allows maximum airflow (and maximum separation). But in regular, normal use, the amount of air into the machine is constantly changing, as the tools are used. As the machine goes from carpet (sealing to the soleplate) to floors (no seal), the amount of airflow into the cyclones changes. This change effects how efficiently the cyclones can separate (and in the case of the red tips on the cinetic models - how fast they oscillate). I would have liked to see the engineering department test for 'ten years' worth of dust using attachments, restricting maximum air movement. As it would have to cope with dust in normal home use.
 
This thread worked better than any anti-depressant for me tonight!!  What a laugh.


 


The bottom line is though, as I knew, Dyson will never manufacture a vacuum cleaner which meets 100% of its marketing promises.


 


On that note, I think I'll vacuum the living room with the 2011 Numatic Henry.  At least that keeps the dust where it belongs...  IN THE BAG!
 
I agree that if you want a bagless, Dyson do it best, but I think that the Dual Cyclone was quite efficient and I don't think that "improving" it with a lot more cyclones has made it any more efficient than the Dual Cyclone its self.
 
i think if the kinetic upright is going to be as good as the kinetic canister we have nothing to worry about for what i had a canister is doing quite well.
 
The Dual cyclonic technology was good, however the suction on them was not as good as modern machines. Since the DC07 was launched, the hose suction on them had been outstanding. Unfortunately they have the 200-255 AW now!
 
Quote Marcus: in fact I think I should start a website for dyson lovers :-) 


 


We did that already. 
smiley-cool.gif



 


I must admit, I am no fan of the 40/41/50 though. The DC07/14 are capable machines. From there it started going downhill. The 40 has design faults more serious than a leaky filter flange. 


 
 
yes dc40 did have quite a few design problems but this is the new 2015 model and all problems have been rectified.
 
Wow! Amazing all the squabbling & bickering over Dyson! Well, one thing for sure....Dyson screwed up the technology instead on the latest Ball models. Call me crazy, but I think I'll stick to my Miele & other vacuums that use HEPA Cloth bags & just throw them out instead. Much simpler & works much better at filtering than any Dyson.

Rob
 
Alex I mean on the dual cyclones, the cyclones affected suction slightly. On newer ones they out less powerful motors in cos ppl were complaining about the DC07 being too powerful
 

Similar threads

V
Anyone else think the pre "ball" Dysons had better Bin/Cyclone designs?
2
Replies
30
Views
1K
Vacuum Facts
Vacuum Facts
mieles5380leo
Best way to clean a Dyson V15
Replies
6
Views
795
cheesewonton
C
V
Bought A Dyson PencilVac From Japan (Review Inside)
Replies
11
Views
2K
Vacuum Facts
Vacuum Facts
Vacuum Facts
Thoughts on the Sebo Balance A1 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner?
Replies
3
Views
883
Absolute Rainbow
A
Z
Shark NV70 Dirt Cup Design
Replies
1
Views
375
zinda
Z

Latest posts

Back
Top