Dyson DC55 Total Clean - Review and impressions

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Although their Dyson DC07 was getting on for 14? years old, it was in VERY good condition and hadn't seen a huge amount of use. In 14 years the filter had only needed washing about 4 times. Filter is pictured... this is it after not being washed for a year and a half! All they vacuum up is fluff and crumbs I think LOL


Anyway remember me saying how I'd had two DC07's in the shed, and how I'd made one good one and one bad one and traded the bad one in when I bought my Dyson?

Well rather than them trade in their low mileage good condition DC07, I gave them the second tatty one out the shed (pictured also) to trade in and I brought theirs home with me.

Recently I did have to fit a new brush roll to their DC07 as the bearings in the old one had failed, and it got a new lower hose that connects to the floor head too, so other than a light clean down I know it needs nothing and works like new!

Win win situation! They get £100 off their new DC50 and I get to swap a tatty Dyson for a decent one!

matt8808-2015031616345802429_1.jpg

matt8808-2015031616345802429_2.jpg

matt8808-2015031616345802429_3.jpg

matt8808-2015031616345802429_4.jpg

matt8808-2015031616345802429_5.jpg
 
@sptyks

"Then, recently I read somewhere that the American Hoover (TTI) WindTunnel Air was lighter and performed as well or better than the Felix. So I decided that since I already own a Hoover WindTunnel Air, I don't really need to spend a lot of money on the Felix."

Whoever said that is ridiculous! I have both, (more like I have 4 of the windtunnel airs, both the original and the steerable one).

You'll have poorer suction which results in the thing never picking up anything on the right side against walls, even though the suction hose is there. Suction on the left side is barely there. Then, the upper windtunnel will clog up with dirt/hair making it useless (personally I think windtunnel technology is just the wrong solution to the problem - a proper chevron roller is the solution). Also, the vacuum will accumulate sand/dirt in those channels and spits it out when you tap on the head when going from bare to carpet floors.

Oh wait, it can't even clean bare floors. I end up using the nozzle itself. The felix OTOH, I barely use the nozzle since it can clean everything w/o it. Just set to level one, bam, no escape for sand on bare floors.

The seals on the bottom of the dirt container will squeal when you transport the vacuum because one bump/jolt on it will let a bit of dirt work its way into it. The hose connectors were barely glued onto it, and thus will work themselves out of the threads and come apart.

Well, it is lighter, and did come with an extension hose and the handle doubles as a extension want, but big deal. It's lighter because the sebo felix is better built. Heck, the motor in the felix power head is slightly bigger than the main motor in the WT air!
 
The flexible crevice tool was good for radiators. The new tool is like the Shark under appliance tool
 
I got £110 off my Dyson without having to trade in. You can send your old cleaner to Dyson if you want or dump it yourself or keep it. The trade in offer is just a discount on the cleaners, not like the old days when certain models that were traded in were reconditioned and sold on. I expect any retailer that takes in a trade in cleaner will just dispose of them.
 
@sprockkets ;

I thought that sounded odd when sptyks said that. So called "windtunnel technology" (I think the word technology is over used in the vacuum industry) is more of a marketing gimmick than actually useful. I have had a couple of Vax's with it an notice no difference whatso ever I performance.

A good sized brush roll with long stiff bristle and a large air intake with good airflow is all you need for a good thorough clean, enter the sebo felix! Of course as well as, the felix has a very powerful brush motor that doesn't slow down on carpets.

Your DC55 looks like it is doing tis job well. I am glad you are finding it versatile. I think the hose and attachment configuration on these dyson is so easy to grab and use.
 
Marketing & Money go hand in hand....

I always assumed "Windtunnel technlogy" has little to do with the brush roll.

After all, the brush roller fitted to the Vax Cordless Air that is advertised as "Windtunnel" has nothing to do with the brush bar, but rather the triple ducts added to the floor head which is why it is so great at cleaning up from the sole plate.

Thus in turn the "Windtunnel" tech on other Hoover vacuums appears to be duo dust channels fitted as opposed to one. My Vax Mach Air also has those dual suction channels.

In theory it should mean better pick up since two or three channels are channeling the dust.

What it may look like a great design aspect also means that the bags or filter chamber will fill up with more dust - hence having to buy more bags if you have a bagged "Windtunnel" or cleaning filters more frequently since more fill-ups are created in the bagless bin.
 
@sebofan

I never figured out the point. If you simply create 3 separate air paths, you basically are back to square one. I spent a lot of time cleaning out dirt that got stuck in those tunnels.

The brush roll can channel dirt more effectively to the air inlet than those "tunnels".
 
I know the Dyson trade in is just a marketing thing but our local Currys are a bit funny over it. I think they have targets to meet for weighing in scrap appliances for recycling or something so they actually seem to want the trade in machines.


Parwaz the DC50 brush bar doesn't have stiff brushes like the DC55. It's more like a worn tooth brush LOL but it does seem to groom the carpet nicely. Of the little test run it got when I was showing them how it all worked it picked up some dust and fluff even after I'd done it with the 55. All in all it seems a canny little machine

matt8808-2015031712572202023_1.jpg
 
Sprockkets and Sebo_fan:


 


I know that my Hoover Windtunnel air has great suction and works very well. It also grooms my carpet very well too. I also know it's not the best at cleaning next to the wall baseboards, but that's what I use my Kirbys for because all five of them have excellent next to baseboard cleaning abilities. As I said earlier my Hoover Windtunnel Air is being used mainly as a quick pickup vac to clean up small messes like the time I spilled half a can of coffee grounds in the kitchen. It got them all in a single pass.


 


As far as windtunnel Technology goes, I have never experienced the type of clogging that Sprockkets describes. I have read how Hoover have invented a type of  suction division across the width of the cleaner head, where each channel has almost the same amount of suction. I have never tried to measure this, but I did this test: I tried sucking up a cup full of coffee grounds that I spread over my carpet. I noticed that it picked up just as well on the left side of the cleaner head as on the right side. Similarly, There is a mathematical formula that Royal used to patent their bell shaped floor nozzle many years ago. The patent describes how the Bell Shaped nozzle amplifies the suction and / or airflow where the nozzle contacts the carpet. There must be some truth in this since Kirby has always used the Bell Shaped nozzle too.
 
sprocketts and sptyks...

The way it sounds is like you are mistaking edge cleaning on either sides for twin dust channels for the suction air to pass through, thus picking up more dust. The two are not the same.

As you can see from this diagram, Hoover "Windtunnel" means two or more paths for suction air to travel through. It may well channel off into ONE main dust channel towards the bag or bagless canister but it just means more dirt "essentially" is picked up and carted off to the bag/bagless bin.

Sptyks: I am unclear as to what you mean by "baseboard" cleaning. My Vax Mach Air has a relatively slim floor head, so getting up to corners is no problem.

sebo_fan-2015031818160003442_1.png
 

Latest posts

Back
Top