Hi, I've come to the conclusion that not just in the last 30 decades, but throughout their whole career, Hoover have been the most arrogant vacuum cleaner company known to man. I got this evidence from YouTube videos of vacuum documentaries and also videos of their vintage and modern failures, mainly from 'The Vintage Appliance Emporium' and also from 'ibaisaic'.
It all started when a man known as Spangler invented the electric vacuum cleaner with a brush. Moving on quickly, a man called Hoover loved this product so much that he bought it and claimed it for himself! He didn't invent anything in the first place!
Moving on even further, the Hoover model 541 was upgraded to the 543. We don't see these cleaners in many historic collections because of the agitator. The agitator killed the motor because it was far too heavy to move and put far too much strain on the motor.
Moving on even further, Hoover made a wet and dry vacuum in 1982 called the Powervac. It failed because the plastic around the motor was of a very bad quality and broke easily after one simple trip over.
Before the PurePower replaced the Turbopower series 2 and 3, I can still even see that Hoover are making more evidence to show they are arrogant, because all their motors began being designed to rely on electric input rather than airflow! All their cleaners were at least 1kw. Who would've thought what was going on? "We want to make a powerful vacuum so all we'll do is just insert an electricity-greedy motor! Genius! Top of the top!" What makes that bad? Well, the motor has less chance of efficiency and it also has an effect on the environment.
As soon as the Purepower came around, things went way too far. The first thing you hear the advert say is 'The inventors of the hoover cleaner have re-invented for today!' Well, my arguments is that firstly, it's the Spangler cleaner, and secondly, their cleaners were far better back in their day when they made the Hoover Junior, Constellation and so many others. They were good back then! (apart from the 543 model and the Powervac, also their 1kw or more cleaners).
The brand new 're-invention' basically meant cheap cheap plastic, brush heads you can NOT recline, and even greedier motors than ever before! They now used 1.4kw!
Things get worse when we get into the 2000s. Hoover continue making more inefficient motors with increasing electric inputs, until we get to 2.3kw! The motors now had to be soft start, and they were now far too noisy to even use them for cleaning!
Hoover felt pressurised over the cyclonic invention, so they grabbed one of their purepowers, and put a transparent door on after inserting a horrible bin design. This gave a significant decrease in airflow quality.
Now, the thing that everyone will remember. Remember 'The One'? More like 'The One that shows how arrogant we are when it comes to us making vacuum cleaners in the 2000s!' They never re-thought the design quality, or increased motor or bin efficiency, they just gave customers their money back and put the big finger on them!
When the EU regulations came tougher in around 2017 (?), Hoover went 'Good God! How are we ever going to make our cleaners any more powerful?' This is because they spent so much time making electricity-reliant motors, that they forgot how to make a more efficient airflow-reliant motor like they did back in the day. So they decided to keep the motors they were already using in compliance to the initial 2014 (?) regulations, and basically just decreased the electric input (this is my theory)! They were trying to give the EU the message that you need to use 3 or 4kw to have a decent vacuum, which I can guarantee is WRONG. Evidently the vintage Nilfisk and BVC vacuums! This, by the way, is why I really miss these fantastic regulations the EU gave to these greedy companies so they can learn something.
In the future I think Hoover will throw us with 5kw vacuums that are too loud and noisy to be used, and just continue to use fancy language to promote themselves.
This, folks, is your chance to tell me your arguments and how much you can relate to what I'm saying. But please don't be hateful. I take banter literally and find it hard to tell whether people are joking or not. Also bear with me with my poor knowledge on the 'The One' vacuum, because all I know is that it was a flop. Anyway I'll leave you all be!
It all started when a man known as Spangler invented the electric vacuum cleaner with a brush. Moving on quickly, a man called Hoover loved this product so much that he bought it and claimed it for himself! He didn't invent anything in the first place!
Moving on even further, the Hoover model 541 was upgraded to the 543. We don't see these cleaners in many historic collections because of the agitator. The agitator killed the motor because it was far too heavy to move and put far too much strain on the motor.
Moving on even further, Hoover made a wet and dry vacuum in 1982 called the Powervac. It failed because the plastic around the motor was of a very bad quality and broke easily after one simple trip over.
Before the PurePower replaced the Turbopower series 2 and 3, I can still even see that Hoover are making more evidence to show they are arrogant, because all their motors began being designed to rely on electric input rather than airflow! All their cleaners were at least 1kw. Who would've thought what was going on? "We want to make a powerful vacuum so all we'll do is just insert an electricity-greedy motor! Genius! Top of the top!" What makes that bad? Well, the motor has less chance of efficiency and it also has an effect on the environment.
As soon as the Purepower came around, things went way too far. The first thing you hear the advert say is 'The inventors of the hoover cleaner have re-invented for today!' Well, my arguments is that firstly, it's the Spangler cleaner, and secondly, their cleaners were far better back in their day when they made the Hoover Junior, Constellation and so many others. They were good back then! (apart from the 543 model and the Powervac, also their 1kw or more cleaners).
The brand new 're-invention' basically meant cheap cheap plastic, brush heads you can NOT recline, and even greedier motors than ever before! They now used 1.4kw!
Things get worse when we get into the 2000s. Hoover continue making more inefficient motors with increasing electric inputs, until we get to 2.3kw! The motors now had to be soft start, and they were now far too noisy to even use them for cleaning!
Hoover felt pressurised over the cyclonic invention, so they grabbed one of their purepowers, and put a transparent door on after inserting a horrible bin design. This gave a significant decrease in airflow quality.
Now, the thing that everyone will remember. Remember 'The One'? More like 'The One that shows how arrogant we are when it comes to us making vacuum cleaners in the 2000s!' They never re-thought the design quality, or increased motor or bin efficiency, they just gave customers their money back and put the big finger on them!
When the EU regulations came tougher in around 2017 (?), Hoover went 'Good God! How are we ever going to make our cleaners any more powerful?' This is because they spent so much time making electricity-reliant motors, that they forgot how to make a more efficient airflow-reliant motor like they did back in the day. So they decided to keep the motors they were already using in compliance to the initial 2014 (?) regulations, and basically just decreased the electric input (this is my theory)! They were trying to give the EU the message that you need to use 3 or 4kw to have a decent vacuum, which I can guarantee is WRONG. Evidently the vintage Nilfisk and BVC vacuums! This, by the way, is why I really miss these fantastic regulations the EU gave to these greedy companies so they can learn something.
In the future I think Hoover will throw us with 5kw vacuums that are too loud and noisy to be used, and just continue to use fancy language to promote themselves.
This, folks, is your chance to tell me your arguments and how much you can relate to what I'm saying. But please don't be hateful. I take banter literally and find it hard to tell whether people are joking or not. Also bear with me with my poor knowledge on the 'The One' vacuum, because all I know is that it was a flop. Anyway I'll leave you all be!
).
