Brian - someone FINALLY asking me what I DON'T like about a Dyson design; how refreshing!
I totally agree about the wands; the T2 setup is much more practical and user-friendly. Also, I wish the wand was slightly longer: I'm only 5ft10, and I find myself stooping slightly to use it. I, personally, could not use this cleaner as a 'daily driver' for this reason.
I agree, too, about the Motorhead wands. Dyson's first Motorhead canister, the DC05, actually had a much better design in that respect; the wand handle could be separated from the main wand. It would be great if they'd just reissue that, but make the electronics in the handle a little more reliable!
Rob - damn, and I'm not even on comission! I think you'll like the FlatOut head; it's incredibly versatile, and goes places no other cleaner head could!
Dyson also have their own microbiology lab, and a multi-million pound destruction-test facility. Hence, they have the lowest return-rate of any vacuum cleaner manufacturer in the US!
<object width=660 height=525><param name=movie value=
></param><param name=allowFullScreen value=true></param><param name=allowscriptaccess value=always></param><embed src=
type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowscriptaccess=always allowfullscreen=true width=660 height=525></embed></object>
<object width=650 height=525><param name=movie value=
></param><param name=allowFullScreen value=true></param><param name=allowscriptaccess value=always></param><embed src=
type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowscriptaccess=always allowfullscreen=true width=650 height=525></embed></object>
<object width=660 height=525><param name=movie value=
></param><param name=allowFullScreen value=true></param><param name=allowscriptaccess value=always></param><embed src=
http://www.youtube.com/v/1wq_sL-4oKU&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6&hd=1&border=1 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowscriptaccess=always allowfullscreen=true width=660 height=525></embed></object>