A flawed test of series vs parallel setups.

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

blackheart

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
1,821
Location
North Dakota
I've been wanting to try this out for a while. since I have two Oreck Buster B's I thought it would be interesting to hook them into a parallel setup and see how it differed from a series setup

Unfortunately things did not go as planned! The first time I tried a parallel test the units were clearly not sealed
The series test resulted in leakage from the body of the 1st unit. I felt they weren't working together as well as they should have been. All I did was connect the hose of the 2nd unit to the exhaust port of the first unit.

It was after testing both those I decided I should have a control setup so then I ran the tests on a single buster B with the central vac hose. I was surprised that it has as much airflow as it had at the end of such a long hose.

Then I spent time re-setting the parallel setup trying to get a better seal and the back pressure created when the hose was attached cause the bucket to begin collapsing. When I tried to take a sealed suction test the bucket caved in and broke seals.

Since i'm feeling lazy here's the CFM number
Parallel initial: 50.87 CFM
Series: (estimated 2200) 57.42 CFM
Single Unit: 53.95 CFM
Parallel (Bucket) 131.02 CFM
Parallel final: 75.5 CFM

Are there better ways to test this? Certainly but the cost of it would be much higher and i'm not curious enough to spend the money.

blackheart-2020020914585703460_1.jpg

blackheart-2020020914585703460_5.jpg

blackheart-2020020914585703460_2.png

blackheart-2020020914585703460_3.png

blackheart-2020020914585703460_4.png

blackheart-2020020914585703460_6.png
 
Hmm

Idk would a extra shopvac to run bypass unit. It would be the vacuum taking the kids and the gain. It may not be possible just thinking out loud.
Les
 

Latest posts

Back
Top