Search results

And here we have “Exhibit C.”

Cost no option? Oversized central system with chameleon hose system and Lindhaus L-ion brush roller for carpet head. More budget friendly option: (modern) Sebo or Miele Canister with electric powered brush roller.

Exhibit “A” right here, Exhibit “B” below, your latest tirade response in YouTube: Like I said, pick any response to anyone in either platform and the odds are your reply is an unfriendly insult. All this does is weaken your position and reinforce beliefs that your positions are nothing but...

Take your pick, the vast majority of your responses here or on YouTube. You don’t have to search long nor hard.

Yet when you’re asked for evidence you respond to vailed name calling and insults. It would go a long way if you tried to “sell” your ideas and beliefs instead of belittling and name calling those who ask for clarifications.

It is a cliffhanger that goes in circles :ROFLMAO:

If somebody’s wanting to buy me one, I do what I consider a deep dive on it. Of course, my deep dive would not be a scientific one, and I suspect a lot of folks would not like the results, no matter what I would find.

I'm sure it does have good advancing technologies. That doesn't automatically make it a better or prefered. There are plenty of people (tests) showing that it has deficiencies...

Asking for sources or evidence on claims is now considered toxic?

I never said it was loud, have no idea. "How I think" is subjective anyway. Where are the (actual) facts and supporting data that backs the claims that the V15 head is "louder and less durable?" Please follow your own advice, do not "further spread of such misinformations." Sorry, "Vacuum...

Louder and less durable? Sources please... Sorry, Dyson marketing doesn't count, and regarding durability how long again has the V16 been in the market? I haven't had any issues with the V15 and tangles, and I have an 'above average use case' when it comes to long hair & tangles. Is the V16...

We're saying the same thing (its not stochastic)

“Verified” by whom? What “models?”

I challenge you to reconsider. If a particle is not picked on the first pass, is it: 1. More probable to be picked up on subsequent passes 2. Less probable to be picked up on subsequent passes 3. Same probability to be picked up on subsequent passes As we’ve already agreed upon the answer is...

The trend of the vacuum's removal quantity of (remaining) dirt per pass is not stochastic. If it was stochastic each pass would randomly remove more, less, or the same amount of dirt, instead of a predictable regression. Variance doesn't make it stochastic. It cannot be both stochastic, and the...

I think the vast majority of people buying these don't do much if any research at all, so they'll automatically assume the newest biggest baddest most expensive version must be the best.

In other, simple terms I believe the V16 brushroll to be mostly a marketing gimmick; to optically differentiate it from the previous generation. Now I'd say there are some nice features ('kompressor', the wand features) that are nice, but they don't provide the 'visual' that the brushroll does...

I can find a lot of faults in my V15 but the anti tangle aspect of the brushroll is not one of those faults. The anti tangle comb works. Coming from a house with 3x long hair females and 1x dog, It works extremely well in the tangle department. The reviews/test show a performance issues in...

Fair enough, however in the context of your video (the chart and information you are trying to convey) it is logarithmically regressive.

To be (somewhat*) fair to the Dyson I ran it after a single cleaning with the Sebo. From ~1700 sq ft plus stairs here is what it picked up. Note a normal equivalent cleaning would take 4-5 Dyson canister dumps. *the “equivalent” and also highly unscientific test I did two passes with the Dyson...