Recent content by frickhelm

I tested this with 60 cm long synthetic hair with an more or less realistic amount of hair and the v16 head was not perfect (it also had this build up ath the side not beeing removed anymore and floating arround) but did much much better compared to the gen5 head with the tested hair lenght and...

I have never seen that kind of power consumption with the v16 - no matter which attachement or cleaning scenario and this 2x power consumption difference from the nominal rating given on the label would be pretty much out of line compared to the older machines. The data was collected from all...

regarding the stain recognition and this robot is the first or only one to do so (including the cleaning pattern) - 3iRobotix ones (this is a brand from the maybe used ODM Pieca) do so - some iRobot ones (that uses ODMs from Picea) do so - and other brands have similar stain recognition.

Same for the robovac (including false information regarding competition) that sadly seems to be PICEA ODM model. Pretty sad.

gen5 and v15. If you take the 315AW unquestioned the 900w might just be a marketing "comparison indicator" how much power would be needed with the older v15 to achieve 315 AW. It is pretty close if you take the 230 AW Hepa version of the v15. 230 / 660 * 900 = 313,14. It is also the same for...

So i am pretty much covinced now (labels + your collected power data) that the "900w" is just a marketing stunt and is the label of the used motor version. Do you have access to IEC 62885-4:2023 for the AW rating? The gen5 was tested against the older 2020 version if i am not mistaken, curios...

hello, just want to add : I would advice to not reset the machine at the given moment. At least in my case i was not able to register it again after doing so (existing and new account did not work). I tried it hoping the initial firmware is hardcoded for fallback reasons to test it again with...