For all those of you familiar with Royal all-metal uprights: does anyone prefer the Rite-Hite screw-type height adjustment system, or the 5-position Au-Toe-Matic toe-touch height adjustment system?
The Rite-Hite adjustment system was until 1987 the only method of adjusting height on a Royal upright. Models 887, 361, 363, 381 and 383 (last four units are heavy-duty commercial models) were the first Royal metal uprights to use the Au-Toe-Matic toe-touch height adjustment system.
Also, some Royal metal uprights with the Rite-Hite adjustor as standard could be specified with the Au-Toe-Matic system by adding an "F" at the end of the model number (e.g. 886F, 6103F). Likewise, some models with the Au-Toe-Matic as standard equipment could be specified with the Rite-Hite system by adding "RH" at the end of those model #s (e.g. 2075RH).
From Royal's official website, those models with Rite-Hite proclaim "infinite" height settings.
So, do you folks prefer the old-style Rite-Hite or the Au-Toe-Matic system? I also want to know if you have modified any of your vintage Royal uprights to use the Au-Toe-Matic, or vice-versa?
~Ben
The Rite-Hite adjustment system was until 1987 the only method of adjusting height on a Royal upright. Models 887, 361, 363, 381 and 383 (last four units are heavy-duty commercial models) were the first Royal metal uprights to use the Au-Toe-Matic toe-touch height adjustment system.
Also, some Royal metal uprights with the Rite-Hite adjustor as standard could be specified with the Au-Toe-Matic system by adding an "F" at the end of the model number (e.g. 886F, 6103F). Likewise, some models with the Au-Toe-Matic as standard equipment could be specified with the Rite-Hite system by adding "RH" at the end of those model #s (e.g. 2075RH).
From Royal's official website, those models with Rite-Hite proclaim "infinite" height settings.
So, do you folks prefer the old-style Rite-Hite or the Au-Toe-Matic system? I also want to know if you have modified any of your vintage Royal uprights to use the Au-Toe-Matic, or vice-versa?
~Ben