Never loses suction promise
The thing is, so many product reviews I have read of late are by owners who haven't got an idea of what they own if they own Dyson. They moan about their Dyson vacuums "losing suction" when something gets clogged, which we all know is completely different from the filter design/cyclonic design.
BUt then that's from average consumers and most owners who wouldn't know the difference between a hard floor "brush" and a suction only floor "brush" tool. Im not counting collectors here because I would imagine most Dyson collectors know everything from the brush roll and their associated caps to all manner of body printing on the machine where components are concerned and where they can be located.
I was also under the impression that the Fantom Thunder had Dual Cyclone tech - so how can it compete fairly with Dyson's latest or current multi-cyclones that carry the "removes more dirt than any other upright?" advertising claim?[this post was last edited: 10/11/2014-13:35]
