I absolutely love this series!!!
I don't have any brochures but I do have 15 almost 16 years of experience with these. Are they perfect== No! Are they great cleaners== Yes. The Hoover PowerMax line of canister vacuums utilizes the exact same attachment set as found on the 1980's Hoover Dimension 1000. Starting with many convertibles and the Hoover Celebrity canister series Hoover created their own attachment set that was unique to them and could not be used on other vacs, nor could other vacs attachments work on the Hoover. While some would look at this as inconvenient and unhelpful, the tool set included was of decent quality with great performance. For instance the Hoover canister upholstery nozzles were fitted with a strip of rubber grooming fingers, unlike competitors which had bristles. This intern utilizes static electricity to groom the pile while reaching deep down embedded dirt to carry it to the air stream. The bare floor brush utilized by Hoover on the Dimension 1000, PowerMax, Futura and 1st generation Windtunnel canisters was terrific. Bristle strips on the sides for stabilization and also edge cleaning along base boards, bristle strips down center of tool allowing dirt to enter air stream and not be pushed away as with other tools, where bristles line perimeter of tool. The chrome wand system with plastic release latches is the same from previous Hoover canisters. Not as convenient as many other canisters on the market, but yet a reliable system and user friendly, especially is you had previous Hoover canister experience!!
The power nozzles on this series were very powerful, with great torque. Although they used a stretch belt system, the powerful motor on these nozzles would greatly outperform many other power nozzles on the market with a stretch belt. The genuine Hoover belt for these models was the same as on Quadraflex Powermatics and is part number 38528-011, a wide stretch belt with small diameter so it took quite a while before it was too stretched to perform well. In 16 years of using these vacs, I have yet to have a belt break, and I only replace them about once a year.
The double row helix bristled agitator with auger design is the same as on the Hoover Elites. Early PowerMax canisters up till around 1999 used a solid continuous dual bristle row with only 2 spaces-- 1 for belt area and other for middle nozzle support bar. Around 1999 Hoover streamlined this agitator to be the exact same part number to work with their Elite, Encore, Sprint, Preferred, Dimension, Futura, Runabout, TurboPower 1500, 1700, 2000, 2200 and similar styled 12" Elite uprights. The base plate of the Elites had 3 base plate support bars, and therefore the brush roll had 2 extra notches in between the bristles to match the bar. Entry level Hoover canister series that used a non-headlight equipped hood utilized a single row bristle agitator part number: 48414079. Higher echelon models such as Futura Supreme, PowerMax Deluxe, PowerMax Supreme, PowerMax Ultra, TurboPower 5000, and 6000 utilized the dual row bristled agitator part number: 48414081.
Hoover PowerMax series canisters offer a very large bag capacity Type S bag. If you compared this bag size to competing canister vacuums at the time such as Eureka World Vac with a Type V bag, Dirt Devil can vac, Electrolux bags, and many other canisters, Hoovers had a terrific capacity. Similar in size to the Kenmores and Panasonics bag capacity which is also quite generous. Now available from Hoover are Type S HEPA bags which I highly recommend.
Sadly the wheels on these units are a major disappointment. The suction unit utilizes smooth plastic wheels in the rear and a plastic swivel in the front. Positioning of the wheels is great, but the wheels need traction and would do better with a neoprene or rubber coating. They had a tendency to skid on waxed floors. The suction unit also 2 carpet skids on the front on either side of the swivel wheels. These had a tendency to catch and clack along on some ceramic tile grouted floors. I would have preferred these glides not exist. The power nozzle wheels contained 2 plastic front wheels on rounded metal axles. The rounded metal axles turned in the connecting base causing a squeak. These front wheels on the power head should have been twice as wide and had axles that better snapped into base with splined, hex, or squared off ends so the axle couldn't turn in the base. The worst wheels on this system were the rear power nozzle wheels. Very cheaply made built together plastic wheel on axle system. Wheels were not sealed so dirt got caught in these and grinded axle so that wheels would not turn right after a few years and get stuck. Additionally placement of these wheels should have been further back so that if you reclined handle back, with power nozzle in upright position, you could roll the unit around. Not the case with the design on this. The wheels were positioned too far in and unit would not lift rear of nozzle off floor enough on rear wheels to wheel around a room.
Filtration on these units is fair at best. I am an allergy sufferer and never had a problem with it, but performing service on these I could see where a lot of dirt is blown out into the air. Unit should have had an exhaust filter exactly where dirt exits machine. Premotor filter should have been more substantial.
The cord on these was extremely stiff. The extremely stiff cord, especially in colder conditions was too stiff for the cord winder and caused several cord winders to fail prematurely. Also cord kept that permanent coiled up look rather than straightening out.
Pictured below is my Hoover PowerMax Supreme S3530. This was a later model PowerMax, I believe built in 2001. This was after Hoover eliminated the Futura line and utilized the Futura style power nozzle hood under the PowerMax name.
