1959's The New Look in Vacuum Cleaners

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

unimatic1140

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Moderator
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
791
Location
Minneapolis
Hi everyone, this morning's blog post on Product Stat is a great review of 1959 vacuum cleaners. While I'm sure some will disagree with their findings, it sure makes for an interesting read...

Click here to read it: The New Look in Vacuum Cleaners

I have 100's of more articles to add to the Product Stat Blog and I will be trying to add new articles daily to the site for a while. If there is an article you like and you are a Facebook user, please click the like button at the bottom of the article. Clicking the like button on any article you enjoy will help me greatly in determining what types of articles everyone likes so I can try to post more on that type of subject matter on the blog.

Thanks everyone!
 
Thank You again.....

It would be great to see more of these older consumer reports or other testing information from the 40's, 50's etc.


Thanks very much.


PR-21
 
It would be great to see more of these older consumer reports or other testing information from the 40's, 50's etc.

Thanks Bud, I have plenty more Vacuum related things to post. I plan on trying to do a vacuum cleaner related post at least once a week. Please do check the new Product Stat website often for updates on all kinds of products.
 
It was a mixed bag back then. Some things were better made, some were not. I owned cars with wing vent windows, curb feelers, suspensions so loosy-goosy the car would roll so bad the curb feelers would scrap during a brisk left hander (say to make a yellow light in the left turn notch), defrosters that didn't, vacuum wipers that stopped working when you accelerated, tube AM only radios, bias ply tires, drum brakes that were scary dangerous in the rain, suspensions that had to be lubed regularly and frequently by hand or the whole car squeaked like a cheap motel matress, and you had manual steering that required about twenty turns lock to lock, made parking lots of fun!

Or how about motorcycles with engines that needed top end rebuilds every 20K miles, often less than that (cast iron cylinders and heads), no through studs from the case to the head so a hot engine could start lifing the cylinder barrels off the case when you got on it, and small tube diameter frames with cast junctions that flexed visibly under any kind of hard cornering load. Riding my old iron barreled Sportsters fast on a mountain road you could see the skinny forks flex and the frame felt like it had a hinge under the seat from the way it would load up and let go, what piles of shyte those things were. Rear tires back then were skinnier than modern front tires and everything was bias ply and slithered around under cornering loads or on rain grooves. No drive belts or O-ring chains back then either, you had to oil the chain every other gas stop and it was always messy back there from oil flung off the chain. Modern carbon fiber belts are so much better.

TVs were black and white, had no horizontal or vertical hold to speak of (you had to adjust vertical and horizontal hold seemingly every time you changed channels, but you only had 13 channels max back then), required constant little adjustments to contrast and brightness, antennas required constant fiddling to find a signal and all the stations went off the air from midnight till 6:00 am. At midnight they would show a picture of a US flag waving in the breeze, play the national anthem and from then till six all you would see is a test pattern. Oh yeah, you had to march down to the tube tester in the grocery store at regular intervals to test your tubes and replace the defective ones. I vividly remember my dad showing me how to use a heavy duty screwdriver to discharge something in the back of the TV so you didn't kill yourself when you started removing the tubes to test them. Eff that!


No pcs back then, no internet, no web discussions like this, and vacuums back then were not all that powerful in many cases. Some were close to what you can buy today but vacs didn't really start getting good until the 1980s.

Oh, and back then peanut butter was not homogenized, so the oil separated and required vigorous stirring every time you opened the jar. And people smoked in the grocery store. Gross. I remember watching a butcher cut meat with a smoke in his mouth. Everyone smoked everywhere. It was horrible that way.

And, there was no duct tape!

Nope, I am very much glad I live when I do and not in the past.
 
Interesting that the Electrolux Automatic F was listed at $99.75 - which was it's price without the optional $19 cord winder - yet the machine is pictured WITH the cord rewinder.

Vacuums in the past clogged up really fast. The old one-ply bags were terrible at filtration. The Air-Way, Filter Queen, and Rainbow were about the only machines that were really good at filtration, and the Rainbow never clogged or lost suction (no matter what James Dyson would say).

Sad that they never mentioned the Hoover blowing dust out of the rug, filling the air in the room. Anyone who used a Constellation for more than a moment knows this.
 
Modern paper bags are pretty lousy too. I didn't even half fill one of my vacs using a paper Kenmore C bag and the vac was already dusty inside the bag chamber and a little bit in the motor compartment. Field stripped, cleaned (again, sigh) and this time put a good HEPA bag in it. No more dust.
 
I think..

Most of the old cars I have had drove great, but most were Chrysler products which had torsion bar suspension which was wonderful , their power steering and brakes were far superior to anything today, one finger turned it and the tip of your toe shopped it, as for vacuums...I can prove several made in the 50s were much more powerful than the new stuff, a Dual Deluxe Sunbeam or Apex Strato Cleaner has as much sealed suction and much more airflow than ANYTHING today...Im ready for the TIME MACHINE...cause if anyone ever invets one..IM GONE!!LOL..And boy would I go back to the 4 channels we used to get if I could see Arthur Smith in the morning, the Betty Feezor Show, I could go ON and oN!!!
 
I wish they had tested a Compact or Revelation (the version sold by vacuum stores). Those have plenty of power, perhaps not as much as the Sunbeam or Apex but certainly enough to do a fine job of vacuuming most surfaces. They also have good filtration with the primary filter bag and large secondary filter on the nose of the motor. Disposable paper bags were also available to fit in the reusable filter bag that eliminated most dirty bag issues and added a third layer of filtration. Properly maintained Compacts last a long time because the motors stay clean and the rest is mostly made of high quality metal castings.


 


I am looking forward to seeing more tests, can't wait!
 
great read

Do you have anything on Shampooer Polishers and household floor Buffers?
I remember my mom buffing our hard wood floors as a child in the dinning room.and waxing was a chore back then with paste wax.not like todays liquid waxes.and a sponge mop.
 
No web-discussions like this?

Who said that? 
smiley-laughing.gif
smiley-tongue-out.gif


super-sweeper++8-22-2014-23-19-6.jpg.png
 
Different strokes for different folks Kenkart. I grew up driving and wrenching on 1950s through 1970s Chrysler products, from an old flathead six Plymouth with three on the tree and electric overdrive (that's the rolly polly piglet that scraped the curb feelers on corners) to a big old hairy chested ex-CHP Monaco that the Chippies put a hot cam (street Hemi grind I believe), baffled sump, windage tray, yanked the mufflers off of and did some other things to (it had oil coolers for the engine, gearbox and power steering). It was what they called a "140 cruiser" because it topped out at 140 mph (unmodified CHP Monacos topped out at 126 mph I was told), if you could keep it in tune (ha, no small feat). There was a 1964 Valiant and an early 70's Satellite sedan in there too. In hindsight the only good one of the bunch was the Valiant. The rest were poorly made cars. The Monaco was a maintenance nightmare and when the cloth insulate wiring in the old 54 plymouth started to rot it was one short after another. Again, horrible.

All of Chryslers autoboxes called it quits around 100K miles unless you put a Transco Stage 3 shift kit in them, otherwise the second to third upshift took too long and the slippage would heat everything and eventually burn out the transmission. That shift kit was shall we say firm but didn't allow any of the slippage that led to premature transmission failures in stock Torqueflites. It would chirp the tires accelerating into second gear on the Valiant which I'm sure wasn't so good for the old fashioned ball and trunion front U-joint (gawd Chrysler stuck with those miserable things forever).

I didn't know what a well built and well thought out car was till I bought my first high end German sedan. One finger steering and brakes you only have to breathe on to put your head in the dashboard? Nah. I like good German iron with solid heavy steering and brakes you can modulate right on the wee edge of lock up without getting into the ABS, four wheel discs when nearly all American cars still had rear drums. German cars are tactile and talk to you in ways no American car does. They don't start to feel light at speed either. A mid 70's Mercedes 280E or BMW Bavaria was so much better in every possible way than any American car of that era at any price it isn't even funny. Floaty boats like those old American cars with no weight to the steering and no damping in the suspension are horrible to drive, at least to me they are. American car companies are only now starting to figure it out but pushed to the edge of traction the German cars don't feel like the want to bite you, they'll let you play at the edge of the tires, while most American cars and Toyotas start to get kinda loose feeling like they might roll or swap ends.
 
I’m not a big fan of the way old American large sedans drive either, but comparing a Mercedes or BMW Bavaria to most any Chrysler of the era is a little unfair. When the Bavaria was introduced about ‘70 they advertised it at $4995 but hardly anyone ever saw one of those, close to $6000 was more like it by the time it hit the dealership with a few options. Still a good value for a nice car but far more than the vast majority of Chrysler products actually sold for.

If the Bavaria had an automatic it was a ZF three speed which at the time wasn’t known for longevity. In the late ‘70s I had an acquaintance who for years had bought second hand Citroens and driven the crap out of them. Citroen left the US in ‘73 and so he a found nice, well kept Bavaria. First the ZF died, once that was fixed the cylinder head cracked, another known issue with the old BMW inline sixes. It wasn’t a bad car but took lots more maintenance than most, I remember how flummoxed he was trying to keep that thing running.

ZF eventually fixed the three speed, my mother drove an early ‘80s Peugeot 505 to over 180,000 miles which had one of the last three speed automatics but the next year they supplied a four speed to both BMW and Peugeot. That gearbox was so bad it often failed during a routine smog test! Seems like the clutches wouldn’t release fully in neutral and if the engine was then revved up as the test required it could destroy them. There were lawsuits against BMW on that one. My mother replaced the 505 with an Eagle Premier in ‘92 which had a ZF four speed automatic. That gearbox lasted 67,000 miles being driven by the proverbial little old lady schoolteacher before it died. I much prefer to shift my own gears but if I were buying an automatic would not trust any ZF gearbox unless I knew for sure that it had been around for awhile and proven reliable.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top