Search results

@Vacuum Facts thinks I completely misunderstands EVERYTHING he stated/said/explained/whatever. @cheesewonton we would appreciate it if you can recap the entire test procedure (the methods, the environment, the results, etc.) for us right here publicly at VacuumLand.org? Heck, I would've liked...

Did you use 3-in-1 electric non-detergent oil (again)?

@centralsweeper63 @blackheart that would be straight-up misinformations. Dyson himself invented the cyclonic vacuum cleaner, inspired by the industrial cyclones for sawmill and factories, @cheesewonton, not the "mere" bagless vacuum cleaner which you are describing. Dyson used proper cones with...

Yes, I am. In fact, I should be the one asking you.

I never wanted a different thread made. I wanted diversity, not fragmentation. Objectivity requires neutrality as well. It means there should be no bias, of which you, @royalfan103 and @Hatsuwr and @blackheart, are either full of or is hidden beneath your... "consistency". The problem is that...

Too different, bro. This copycat thread is too different from my original, whereas my remake indeed is similar enough to be deemed as spam by @Ant_Tenna. This once again proves that without context, the poll isn't just different - it's WORSE, because there would no longer be any explanation to...

Before I suggest anything, may I ask you: 1) Do you want corded or cordless? 2) How large is your home? 3) Are you allergic to anything in particular?

You actually liked that Lux and Kenmore, I'll give you that. I made the poll for diversity.

I made the original poll to see which seriously flawed machines are more popular, among VacuumLand.org. @Vacuum Facts wanted more diversity, so I chose that poll as a sticking point for all to go to. But then, just like other brands copying Dyson and their innovations, some deemed all my...

And that's a problem.

Not gonna lie, it can be intense at times.

Unfortunately, @royalfan103 refused to acknowledge that the context were COMPLETELY necessary. No context, no way of knowing how and why. He even tooted his own horn in, declaring his worse thread (here) is FAR BETTER than my original. I'm aware this is NOT TRUE, altogether I do actually...

You are wrong. But since you will control this copycat thread, I guess I'll just leave it at it is, for the most part.

It may be a joke, but it's true. It can damage your toe. You're supposed to be careful. @Vacuum Facts love modern innovations. I understand him about that.

Guess some of you haven't heard of any compact uprights, carried over canisters or stick vacs.

@Vacuum Facts has already done similar methods.

I am not sure. I only know that one of my post was deleted, accusing me of taking over this copycat thread. Still can't get over the mod locking down the true remake of the original.

It's ok. This whole forum-org is just an echo chamber of ignorance. I inherited from @Vacuum Facts because he's the most objective out of the bunch here. Too bad he can be stubborn and obtuse - sometimes even ungrateful - at times.

1) These are actual contexts, not slops. 2) I gotta be try approaching the objective-ness of @Vacuum Facts. 3) I had to remake my original thread. Too bad Alan chose to remove the real remake. @royalfan103 was merely duping my thread.