Search results

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

  1. V

    Paid Dyson and Shark reviews plaguing internet

    Just wondering if you watched any of these videos before posting this? The first 2 clearly mentioned that Dyson sent them the vacuum. A wave of these vids came out on the release date as Dyson clearly sent them out to a lot of creators before the release with the condition that their videos...
  2. V

    Paid Dyson and Shark reviews plaguing internet

    Well one of those reviews is mine. The last one. And I certainly didnt get any money or a free V10 from anyone. I paid the ungodly sum of $700 like everyone else. I have bought all the vacs I have reviewed so far, though I am being senta free robot vacuum from an upstart company to me this...
  3. V

    Do My Airflow Measurements on the Kirby Avalir 2 Make Sense.

    Well after making the airflow box intake hole exactly the dimensions of the kirby inlet, and using the anemometer free hand, I got the cleaner head numbers up to 4962 or 129 cfm still not 137 cfm. I have not taken it fully apart, as Im not confident enough yet, but I have taken it apart...
  4. V

    Do My Airflow Measurements on the Kirby Avalir 2 Make Sense.

    according to this site http://dpvac.com/chart.html 40 inches was standard water lift for whatever Kirby they were referencing. Still not sure if that is normal though. Later on I am going to retest the airflow at the cleaner head with a few changes. I think the holes were a bit too small, also...
  5. V

    Do My Airflow Measurements on the Kirby Avalir 2 Make Sense.

    I dont have the exact water lift numbers handy but it was about 40 inches at the hose. That seems low compared to other vacs (I get about 96 inches with the high end Sharks and Dysons) Though the Kirby obviously destroys all of those with Airflow. Yeah I have seen Vaclabs vids on this (and...
  6. V

    Do My Airflow Measurements on the Kirby Avalir 2 Make Sense.

    I bought a slightly used Avalir 2 off Ebay. It seems to be great after inspection but I am wondering if these airflow numbers line up with what is expected. 7126 FPM or 185 CFM when measured directly on the fan (with PVC Pipe) 4685 FPM or 122 CFM at the cleaner head (when sealed to an airflow...
Back
Top