Search results

Lets beak it up, guys.

@Turbo500(again)Then i guess that oreck TV ad is false advertising.

IDK, he just said "break". They probably cracked because theyre made of cheap plastic. Im not in any way doubting that dysons are good vacuums, they just have a lot of design flaws.

Could someone do me a favor and post a vid of a lewyt 55 or 44 on youtube? THeyre some of my favorite vacs but ive never heard one run.

That dyson brushroll is prone to breaking-- The guy at the vac shop told me that dyson brushrolls break real easy, and he cant count how many times he's had to put a new brushrollon a dyson because the it broke. As fo the kirby, on the other hand, has a strong wooden brushroll thats nextto...

@turbo500: Agreed!

Suction power, cleaning performnce, easiness to use, (dyson won that one), convenience, and price (dyson won those two.) But kirby won: cleaning performance, suction power, and easiness to use. (its self propeed and the dyson i was using wasnt. But i think cleaning performance is the most importnt.

Ummm Two speed switch? I never knew that a kirby had that.

I recently performed a Kirby G4 vs. Dyson DC 25 test. And kirby outweighed dyson in almost every test. And, of course, my opinion is that kirbys are the best. Could i hear some more peoples opinions?

Thanks for your help, guys. I have been looking at thrift stores a lot for vacuums, and i havnt found anything made before 1950. Although i did find a mid-60's hoover convertible, ut it was a POC so i ddnt get it.

Just out of curiostity, how rare would it be to find a pre-1940 vacuum at a thrift shop? Just wonderin.