Search results

So we should only measure suction?

Two entirely different versions of the same thread.

Not to mention the physics, as @Vacuum Facts have told us. Performance Reviews is wrong in this case. Who in the right mind deny the brushrolls on carpets when such floorhead's are designed to agitate and separate the piles to deep-clean carpets?

Really, VacLab should hire you, @Vacuum Facts

@Vacuum Facts great! How about you finally tell us about the mod that fixed the V16! TechRadar was so close to figuring the whole thing out but not only they ended up failed (they mis-blamed the floorhead), they didn't even bother double-checking or re-testing it again. Sad. V16 is a tragic...

And no Dyson, no more Shark, and Samsung and LG cannot make vacuum cleaners at all. If Hoover had forever patents and becomes monopolistic, well... So much gray areas. I think the older rules should stay: like, a patent shouldn't last more than 18 years. But shouldn't be so quick to expire...

You did vote for the same option after all. Dyson patented the stuff too.

Oh my god... What a doozy! That's why I voted for Dyson. It's not just the most popular option out of the three, it's the safest option as well since Dyson was the one perfecting the cyclones.

Who do you vote? Anyways... Agreed with you on Dyson.

@royalfan103 any images?

The title is the question in this case. It's been widely accepted that Dyson have invented the cyclonic vacuum cleaner, but the likes of @cheesewonton didn't accept that and said that Rexair was the first cyclonic vacuum cleaner. More source (including AI, as started down the quote though you...

Yes, it's true that Rexair is the first bagless vacuum cleaner. However, looking by https://rainbowvacuummanila.com/our-history web... It's just a regular separator, equivalent to Dyson's main bin with shrouds. Barely cyclonic. @cheesewonton you're stretching the actual definition of cyclonic...

Does the Rexair really be able to spin the microscopic stuffs down inside the machine? Or does it circle around? It may be the first bagless, but is it really the first true cyclonic?

Oh ok.

@Vacuum Facts thinks I completely misunderstands EVERYTHING he stated/said/explained/whatever. @cheesewonton we would appreciate it if you can recap the entire test procedure (the methods, the environment, the results, etc.) for us right here publicly at VacuumLand.org? Heck, I would've liked...

Did you use 3-in-1 electric non-detergent oil (again)?

@centralsweeper63 @blackheart that would be straight-up misinformations. Dyson himself invented the cyclonic vacuum cleaner, inspired by the industrial cyclones for sawmill and factories, @cheesewonton, not the "mere" bagless vacuum cleaner which you are describing. Dyson used proper cones with...

Yes, I am. In fact, I should be the one asking you.

I never wanted a different thread made. I wanted diversity, not fragmentation. Objectivity requires neutrality as well. It means there should be no bias, of which you, @royalfan103 and @Hatsuwr and @blackheart, are either full of or is hidden beneath your... "consistency". The problem is that...

Too different, bro. This copycat thread is too different from my original, whereas my remake indeed is similar enough to be deemed as spam by @Ant_Tenna. This once again proves that without context, the poll isn't just different - it's WORSE, because there would no longer be any explanation to...