Search results

I should've made the choice even clearer.

Uh oh. Ask @Vacuum Facts again. I wanted diversity, not mockery.

@Vacuum Facts I really hope you're V16 review go viral and become extremely popular. That should teach stupid reviewers a lesson!

I'm not trying to misunderstand you. I'm trying to figure everything out. @Vacuum Facts, I really hope your V16 review go viral and become genuinely popular.

@Vacuum Facts' lecture here. He wants us to figure it out ourselves by relying on it.

I offered the last option.

@Vacuum Facts, this is the first time I'm aware of that you failed to provide evidence. Very unusual, but even then it's deliberate from the start. No wonder why people struggles to understand you. At this point, might as well rely on your lecture. Good luck.

It's only true when everything else is equal. @Vacuum Facts suggested it's much more nuanced than that, which allows the vacuum to perform similarly with lesser suction. His lecture says it all.

Remember the max power estimates? It proves V16's motor has extremely similar motor efficiency compared to every previous flagships since the V11 (185 * 545 / 900 ≈ 305.5 AW).

Nah, @Vacuum Facts doesn't have time nor the willingness to test these products.

Ohhh, so by the data and evidence you sent, you meant your YouTube lecture.

You've fixed the V16 too, but you didn't give us the method. You have all the evidence, but you only releases it when you ever decide to altogether instead of just sharing it right away. That attitude is the main drawback of you (and your objective and evidence- and data-based approach), no...

@Vacuum Facts since you have all the evidence, and I (along with many others) gotten your data, I want you to show us the method.

@Vacuum Facts you thought everyone can figure it out ourselves because there's enough data now. You claim the data is there, but where is it? You seems pretty confident, enough that you chose not to give away where and why should you continue to be tight-lipped, all because you want to teach the...

Unless pre-tangled or pre-rolled, that is.

But @Vacuum Facts did the Dyson for good reasons. Maybe we should be having better and more civil discussions instead of making fun of each other.

@Vacuum Facts, so your and @frickhelm 's method(s) is(/are) the best, because it's (both) consistent, reproducible and representative, similar to laboratories' standard, but accessible and doable at home, especially if you have backed carpets (not shaggy rugs as Kirby fans would've suggested)...

Nah, cleaning performance and cleaning efficiency is more important. It's how vacuums have to effectively and efficiently use its airflow and suction. Ask @Vacuum Facts

Okay... So did anyone (else) try to properly measure actual cleaning performance?

@Vacuum Facts I thought of this: Dyson V16 Piston Animal: The superior vacuum with a crippling secret *Hypothetical review tries to explain why V16 got worse performance but most likely fails to reveal the modification needed to fix it*