Search results

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

  1. H

    Who really invented the cyclonic vacuum cleaner?

    Rexair*. I know you don't want to hear/admit this, but @cheesewonton provided the patents saying so in the other thread... Now if you want to qualify it as 'double cyclonic,' that might be Dyson, but that is not what you polled. Here is the link @cheesewonton provided to the patent from the...
  2. H

    Bearing Press?

    I've got one just like that. Doesn't get used much, but it is certainly worth it when it is used!
  3. H

    Main Equivalency! Which one would you take?

    Why do you think "Dyson" is not a "capitalistic brand?" From Google Search AI Summary of "Dyson company financials:" For those keeping score those are pretty healthy numbers; 19.7% overall margin.
  4. H

    Main Equivalency! Which one would you take?

    @Absolute Rainbow FYI the website domain "dysonworship.com" is available. https://www.name.com/domain/search/dysonworship.com
  5. H

    Help me decide: Nilfisk GD930, or Aerus, or something else

    I have about the same size house, and here is my quick and dirty (ha) thoughts: I have Dysons V15 and a V7: The V15 could do the top floor (2/3 LVP, 1/3 carpet) and 'maybe' the carpeted stairs on one charge & auto mode. Had to dump the thing 4-5 times. The bottom floor is all carpet and has...
  6. H

    Main Equivalency! Which one would you take?

    So in your mind "diversity" = forcing your & @Vacuum Facts opinions & biases (yes, they are opinions & biases, not 'facts!') upon everyone else?
  7. H

    Pick your poison: Main equivalency!

    This is another great example of theory versus real world application.
  8. H

    Pick your poison: Main equivalency!

    In my experiences even though the theory and science may point to one thing, the physical execution of said theory & science can have little details or nuances that affect the science and theory in ways unplanned by the engineers. Or sometimes there are factors that aren't originally considered...
  9. H

    Pick your poison: Main equivalency!

    Yes, or at least called it the wrong thing and then died on the hill defending it.
  10. H

    Pick your poison: Main equivalency!

    Again, @Vacuum Facts is not objective, not in the least sense of the word. Just because someone claims* to be and puts out a bunch of scientific looking graphics, charts, etc., that does not make one objective. *I'm not certain even @Vacuum Facts makes the claim that they are objective.
  11. H

    Pick your poison: Main equivalency!

    @Vacuum Facts is objectively not objective. Far from it. This has been demonstrated many times both here and on YouTube.
  12. H

    Picked up a 6hp Cordless Machine Today!

    It definitely falls into the “brute force” category.
  13. H

    Picked up a 6hp Cordless Machine Today!

    No fair you have self-propelled!:)
  14. H

    Picked up a 6hp Cordless Machine Today!

    Powerful but not for stairs. Since technically speaking its a vacuum:
  15. H

    Pick your poison: Main equivalency! Which one would you take?

    I suppose I will answer like I did in the other one. Central vac oversized for the house, with Chameleon hose system, with Lindhaus PB14e L-ion powerhead. If that isn't allowed :rolleyes: then a Sebo D4.
  16. H

    The cordless stick vac formfactor

    If your DC33 was anything like ours (wife's old machine) I am not surprised. Our V7 and V15 suck up more dirt than it does. But in all seriousness I can go months too without washing those two (V7, V15) pre-motor filters before noticeable performance issues. The V15 one gets stinky (pet dander...
  17. H

    Pick your poison: Main equivalency!

    How ironic! If you would only apply your suggestions to your own material. From your own link to your own video you mention how important it is to base your comment starting at about 7:14 and running to about 7:33 Want an example? Here you go...
  18. H

    The cordless stick vac formfactor

    Yes it is, your statement of the below is unequivocally false, as you can't provide even a scrap of evidence to prove otherwise:
  19. H

    Pick your poison: Main equivalency!

    How is this off topic when you are the one bringing deceptive falsities into the discussion, that are some of your very own arguments pertaining to what differentiates a dyson cyclone from another cyclone... You just don't like or won't admit when you're wrong about something.
  20. H

    The cordless stick vac formfactor

    In this case he’s claiming stuff Dyson isn’t even trying to claim! @Vacuum Facts we are on topic; you brought this topic into the conversation, it is one of YOUR talking points. Edit: I see he has provided additional links from the original posts, where now all three have the same language of...
Back
Top