Search results

You claim to post "facts." You brought this up, not me. When you are asked to prove these "facts, "you cannot. Something that cannot be proven, by definition is not a "fact." Are you trying to fool people with superfluous links and information? In this particular instance, I find it difficult...

I looked at all three of them, now twice for good measure. The “retailers regurgitated” one makes the claim but it is unsubstantiated; no source is provided. It is an obsolete advert for a third party seller of DC50* The “particle beam laser diffraction” link has no reference whatsoever to...

Is there a reference to this besides some unreferenced marketing material? Edit: I found this, where it states: “Dyson cyclones can capture particles down to 0.5 microns” But no where I can see makes the >99% or any other percent of that size particle capture rate claim. Nor can I find any...

Conversation of what? Your unfiltered Dyson worship?

Believe or not I have a V15 and a V7. I too think they are pretty good. But they aren’t by any means the end all be all. Performance wise (my experience here) in max mode they approach what a good plug in can do, but don’t equal it. Where I find they suffer versus the good bagged units is the...

Now if only a few certain posters here would also formulate their “vacuum facts” from credible evidence.

Well this is refreshing, the first part anyway. Yet we are supposed to ignore others 'amatuer testing' but put full faith in your 'amatuer testing.'

See post #65. See just about any post you reference Vacuum Facts.

Thank you; and now that you say this, in my mind I was thinking of DC motors. To get into the weeds a bit specifically my mind was on battery powered hand tools; if memory serves the performance/efficiency of a brushed DC motor at full tilt isn't far off of the equivalent brushless DC motor...

Please mods, strike this down!

Breaking news: These tests are in fact not actually lab-like. Well depends on how much leeway you give the word "-like"

Now that is some funny stuff.

I am somewhat surprised a big brand hasn't hopped on the marketing bandwagon with these, for the sake of being able to say "no carbon brush dust." Although if my understanding of the technology is correct, it doesn't generate much (if any?) efficiency gains at full power, but certainly does at...

I can visualize that airflow being real effective. Hard for me to explain, but I think the flow of air is in the same direction and focused/strongest right at the rear of the brush opening. Right where it needs/should be.

From perhaps the late '80s early '90s can remember a Kirby salesman do the whole demonstration plus some, and then my dad saying no thank you. I remember it pretty well as I was disappointed we didn't get a new toy (was around 10-12 at the time) At the time we had a Kirby Classic III, and I...

Does the metal tray have additional baffles or is the 'inside' profile a simple stamping (what you can deduce from the picture)

Vacuum “facts” is basically asking who makes a copy of Dyson that actually isn’t a copy; and if it has features or characteristics that don’t make it a copy of a Dyson, then it doesn’t qualify. By his criteria it is impossible to find an example. One can make this same question/argument about...

You just can’t help yourself. But I’ll make a deal with you. If you show actual receipts for your claims and conclusions, I won’t challenge you to do so.

The hits keep coming! Let’s not forget you asked for examples of this behavior. You asked in this very thread. So, now both asking for evidence on your claims and also directly answering (ahem providing evidence) gets one called a troll amongst many other things.

Now “exhibit D.”