Recent content by herbicide

It definitely falls into the “brute force” category.

No fair you have self-propelled!:)

Powerful but not for stairs. Since technically speaking its a vacuum:

I suppose I will answer like I did in the other one. Central vac oversized for the house, with Chameleon hose system, with Lindhaus PB14e L-ion powerhead. If that isn't allowed :rolleyes: then a Sebo D4.

If your DC33 was anything like ours (wife's old machine) I am not surprised. Our V7 and V15 suck up more dirt than it does. But in all seriousness I can go months too without washing those two (V7, V15) pre-motor filters before noticeable performance issues. The V15 one gets stinky (pet dander...

How ironic! If you would only apply your suggestions to your own material. From your own link to your own video you mention how important it is to base your comment starting at about 7:14 and running to about 7:33 Want an example? Here you go...

Yes it is, your statement of the below is unequivocally false, as you can't provide even a scrap of evidence to prove otherwise:

How is this off topic when you are the one bringing deceptive falsities into the discussion, that are some of your very own arguments pertaining to what differentiates a dyson cyclone from another cyclone... You just don't like or won't admit when you're wrong about something.

In this case he’s claiming stuff Dyson isn’t even trying to claim! @Vacuum Facts we are on topic; you brought this topic into the conversation, it is one of YOUR talking points. Edit: I see he has provided additional links from the original posts, where now all three have the same language of...

You claim to post "facts." You brought this up, not me. When you are asked to prove these "facts, "you cannot. Something that cannot be proven, by definition is not a "fact." Are you trying to fool people with superfluous links and information? In this particular instance, I find it difficult...

I looked at all three of them, now twice for good measure. The “retailers regurgitated” one makes the claim but it is unsubstantiated; no source is provided. It is an obsolete advert for a third party seller of DC50* The “particle beam laser diffraction” link has no reference whatsoever to...

Is there a reference to this besides some unreferenced marketing material? Edit: I found this, where it states: “Dyson cyclones can capture particles down to 0.5 microns” But no where I can see makes the >99% or any other percent of that size particle capture rate claim. Nor can I find any...

Conversation of what? Your unfiltered Dyson worship?

Believe or not I have a V15 and a V7. I too think they are pretty good. But they aren’t by any means the end all be all. Performance wise (my experience here) in max mode they approach what a good plug in can do, but don’t equal it. Where I find they suffer versus the good bagged units is the...

Now if only a few certain posters here would also formulate their “vacuum facts” from credible evidence.